This event is scheduled for December 16, 2020 from 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm ET.
For further details, please visit: https://www.theknowledgegroup.org/webcasts/managing-patent-infringement-cases-after-the-duncan-parking-technologies-decision/
About Philip L. Hirschhorn
Phil Hirschhorn is a partner at Panitch Schwarze, an intellectual property law firm. Phil is a trial lawyer specializing in patent litigation and other intellectual property proceedings, including post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board of the USPTO.
Phil’s extensive experience, spanning more than 30 years, includes bench trials, jury trials, and arbitrations. He has represented clients in traditional infringement/validity litigations as well as Hatch-Waxman (Paragraph IV) litigations. Phil also has experience handling copyright, trademark/trade dress, and trade secret litigation. Phil also advises clients on commercial patent licensing agreements.
Phil earned a bachelor’s degree from Columbia College and his law degree from Fordham University School of Law. He is a current co-chair of the Federal Circuit Bar Association’s PTAB/TTAB Committee and the immediate past Chair of the NYC Bar Association’s Patents Committee.
About Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP
Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP is a boutique IP firm with a nationally ranked team of attorneys, focusing on all areas of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret law, across a broad range of technologies. Panitch attorneys regularly represent clients in both ex parte and adversarial proceedings in federal courts and before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The firm’s boutique structure allows Panitch to offer a tailored experience to a broad range of clients, ranging from transnational companies to individual inventors. Panitch’s roots run deep in the domestic and international IP communities.
In its 2019 Duncan Parking Techs., Inc. v. IPS Group, Inc. ruling, the Federal Circuit (the Court) overturned the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) decision which held that ‘310 patent claims were not unpatentable as anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e). Refusing to apply the doctrine of equivalents, the Court also ruled that Duncan’s alleged single-space parking meter infringement did not function in the same way as IPS’ claimed invention. It further affirmed the summary judgment of noninfringement granted by the district court.
Thus, companies and their counsel need to understand how this case impacts current cases and the general patent infringement landscape in order to devise up-to-date and effective litigation techniques.
Join Aaron Pereira and Philip Hirschhorn, patent attorneys from Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP, as they provide an in-depth discussion of the Duncan case and its implications on patent infringement case management. Speakers will also provide practical tips and litigation tactics in bringing out the best in these lawsuits in a rapidly evolving legal climate.
About The Knowledge Group
Founded in November 2006, The Knowledge Group has been at the forefront of providing quality continuing education programs for lawyers, accountants, financial executives, risk and compliance specialists, human resources professionals, technology officers, and business consultants in a wide range of industries.
The Knowledge Group strives to be the best-in-class provider of continuing education by bringing forth relevant content you can’t get anywhere else.